What is close to code, and what is honestly still far.
The Atlas is not a roadmap. It is an inventory. This page groups every capability by how much computational shape it has earned — not how exciting it sounds.
- Capabilities
- 18
- Interactive
- 1
- Proposed
- 3
- Documented only
- 13
Interactive graft
A working prototype exists inside LANSKRIT. You can run it, break it, and file a Graft Receipt.
Conceptualised
A candidate construct type has been named. What is missing is a concrete design, not a research foothold.
- Open entry →
Inclusive and Exclusive Participation
Does "we" include the listener?
Participation and Agency·Research · Under review - Open entry →
Aspect and Event State
Is the action beginning, continuing, repeated, attempted or completed?
Time and Action·Research · Illustrative - Open entry →
Modality, Obligation and Possibility
How certain, permitted or required is this?
Relationship and Responsibility·Research · Under review
Documented
The linguistic finding is on record here. No computational shape has been proposed yet.
- Open entry →
Relationship and Social Authority
What relationship exists between the participants?
Relationship and Responsibility·Research · Source required - Open entry →
Classifier Systems
What kind of thing is this in the current context?
Meaning and Context·Research · Illustrative - Open entry →
Benefactive and Affected-Party Marking
Who benefits from or is affected by this action?
Relationship and Responsibility·Research · Source required - Open entry →
Switch-Reference
Is the subject of this action the same as the subject of the previous one?
Participation and Agency·Research · Source required - Open entry →
Mirativity and Unexpected Information
Is this new or surprising information?
Evidence and Knowledge·Research · Under review - Open entry →
Topic and Focus
What is this statement really about?
Meaning and Context·Research · Under review - Open entry →
Spatial Frames of Reference
Is direction expressed relative to me, to a landmark, or to the world?
Space and Orientation·Research · Source required - Open entry →
Grammatical Number
How many are there, and does that count matter here?
Meaning and Context·Research · Under review - Open entry →
Negation and Scope
What exactly is being denied here?
Meaning and Context·Research · Under review - Open entry →
Causativity and Agency
Who caused this to happen, and how directly?
Participation and Agency·Research · Source required - Open entry →
Politeness and Register
What is the appropriate way to say this here?
Relationship and Responsibility·Research · Source required - Open entry →
Temporal Reference
When, relative to what, did this happen?
Time and Action·Research · Under review - Open entry →
Reduplication, Repetition and Intensity
Is this happening repeatedly, intensely, or in a diminished way?
Time and Action·Research · Under review
Contested
The linguistic finding itself is disputed, or the software analogy is unstable. Kept for honesty, not promotion.